Backgrounds of our cancellation of Contract with UIPM

Dear athletes, trainers and all honestly modern pentathlon sport committed friends,

after a hard but interesting inauguration season 2011 with all of you in modern pentathlon, I decided to cancel the mutual contract (see excerpts: http://www.iq-sport.net/?p=686&lang=en) with your head organisation, the UIPM, due to the following reasons:

  • The UIPM headquarters continuously broke the contract in 2011 in many points
  • the Secretary General, was not present in 90% of the events; no real and direct communication was possible or wanted from UIPM side
  • If it was not for the athletes and the Olympic qualification we would have not attended or carried out the WorldCup Final in London 2011, check details on our website soon.
  • The UIPM have changed their requirements for laser equipment in November 2011 to an unreasonable status:
  • nobody is able to follow or test the new issues in the rules (how serious can someone take a sport federation which makes new rules and does not even (or is not even able) to follow them?
  • the UIPM lasercode is total nonsense (it was not created by anyone who has any experience in that field (neither apeom nor Eko aims) it is good for nothing, but the “new” SIMPOWER hit targets…!
  • the so called “homologated” precision targets are not precise if shots are shot from or with a movement. “Misses” can be made hits by snatching.
  • all our warnings and offers to use reasonable tests and independent experts have been denied
  • the Secretary General tries to cover his “whatever we should call him?” the technical facts he distributes are not true (some of the lies to you, athletes):
  • there is no laser security in the precision targets
  • everybody can “shoot” on every target, even with laser pointers, if they are “pulsating”
  • there is no security that the targets are all working / reacting
  • the same way; each computer can evaluate differently
  • in Charlotte there have even been “sun” shot, means the targets react on reflections of sunlight; how can that be secure???
  • the Secretary General fools all of you with pseudo technical facts:
  • the SIMPOWER targets react within 10 milli seconds (ms); maybe, but
  • you shoot 50 ms signal, and this software version of our system
  • neither is licensed nor suitable to be detected precisely
  • the Secretary General denied the “homologation” of our pPLT, the only really precise and secure device existing. (It is even cheaper than all the other PLT-stuff and has much more future potential; a real IQ-product)
  • we are ready to prove to the world the above lies and will go public with the issues next week.

Interesting details which nobody knew so far:

  • I personally foresaw the current developments and informed the IOC in very high ranks last year in spring already; what I assumed will happen as it does these days.
  • We have been checked by independent laser technology experts and all came to the same conclusions about our IQ-System:
  • perfect system; 100% suitable for Olympic level competition, all security levels thought through.

Conclusion:

I, Klaus Kremer, CEO of Operate-IQ GmbH, am 100% convinced about modern pentathlon, and I appreciate all critical comments and serious challenges, as well as product enhancements.

We are 100% committed to our products and to you athletes, as well as to the true Olympic Ideals and Ideas of fair and pure sport / competition!

Modern Pentathlon was a step on our way, now we are stepping ahead,
we will reasonably support you in the future but will not follow any unreasonable goals of your UIPM body.

We will keep leading the way in laser shooting technology and finding new and exciting paths!

Sincerely yours

Klaus Kremer

Contact me at your convenience, we are ready to support you!

Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, Facts & Background knowledge, IQ-Allgemein, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment

important posts on this website

A compilation of important articles:

Posted in IQ-Allgemein | Leave a comment

UIPM continously breaks the contract with Operate-IQ GmbH

Cologne, 02.29.2012. The  UIPM (World Sport Federation for Modern Pentathlon) does not seem to take  contracts with partners serious, or trying to be complying with them. How else can be explained that the Operate-IQ Ltd. (OIQ) up to today, 7 days before the first World Cup event in Charlotte (USA) has not received an invitation in order to deliver the agreed service for the athletes?

Since the employees of the OIQ accumulate requests from sports associations and officials, as well as the athlete when the employees are to be expected in the U.S., the management has decided to publish excerpts from the joint agreement here. They do not understand or want to support the approach of the UIPM in any way.

OIQ It is primarily interested in the athletes and to provide a fair sport for modern pentathlon. It has been supported and encouraged by OIQ last year alone with over 500 thousand €. The UIPM management has been informed today via email about the consequences by OIQ. We will probably NOT as usual be on site, the question remaining is: why and who is running this game with us?

Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, IQ-Allgemein, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment

OIQ questions all UIPM-”homologations”

Cologne, 07.02.2012, Klaus Kremer, CEO of Operate-IQ GmbH (OIQ), the official UIPM Partner for Laser Shooting Equipment generally questions all UIPM homologated products since August 2011.

In the mutual contract UIPM guarantees to OIQ that all further applicants for UIPM accepted systems will pass the same tests as the OIQ products in 2010 and 2011, in quality and quantity.

Recently UIPM headquarters have completely changed their requirements and have published in the new 2012 technical rules very questionable issues.

The TEAM which created the IQ-shooting-System lists the following issues to be crucial for safe and secure usage; none of which is tested, reported or published by UIPM headquarters:

  • the laser emitting unit has to be entirely safe regarding the laser power, laser diameter on 10m, “shot” length (maximum 20 Milli-seconds (ms = traveling time of a normal pellet on 10m) and “shot” development time
  • in order to avoid cross fire and to achieve a reliable reaction time the “shot” needs to be coded
  • the detection of laser “shots” must be stable and quick (less than  5 ms) in order to be capturing the begin of a “shot” (precision)
  • the detection of the “shots” must work secure in bright but not direct sunlight; and with a minimal laser power
  • the detection systems have to be able to capture shots with reasonable motion
  • the detection of encoded laser “shots” must be possible on precision targets; otherwise the code does not make any sense

Recent tests have proven that none of the UIPM “homologated” products have passed any of the above milestones. OIQ questions why the UIPM headquarters try to avoid to publish and openly communicate their goals in this technology.

Finally, Klaus Kremer states that many recent publications of UIPM headquarters have been published or distributed without direct knowledge of OIQ (the exclusive contract partner), but with severe warnings to the Executive board members from OIQ side:

  • the statements are untrue or not correctly stated: OIQ warned OMEGA and the IOC that the UIPM “homologated” PLT targets are not working correctly; OIQ did not withdraw from the competition, but could not take part, as Mr. Bouzou denied the homologation of the only precise product, the IQ-pPLT
  • OIQ as the exclusive UIPM contract partner is “homologated” with its products by contract
  • OIQ denies the UIPM laser code, as it is totally useless and senseless; OIQ can prove that the code is even contra-productive in usage with “homologated” PLT targets

OIQ suggests all athletes, trainers, federations and other users of laser shooting to finally ask for attests  from independent specialists to check and approve the systems to be used in the fine sport of modern pentathlon.

OIQ with its intelligent and safe IQ-Laser-Shooting System fears no comparison!

Please check our further posts:

the Harland-Snatch-test

UIPM “homologated” targets not precise

Posted in IQ-Allgemein | Leave a comment

UIPM homologated Precision Laser Targets – are not precise at all

With our new CDM test equipment (computer detected motion), we have made facts:

All UIPM homologated precision laser targets (PLT) are not accurate! The proof can be lead easily.

We have tested  all known UIPM homologated PLT targets under the eyes of neutral witnesses with our new CDM system:

  • The detection of laser shots is highly variable (imprecise)
  • All PLT must be given the highest available excess energy = laser power (which in turn requires the utmost care and security in the firing units)
  • All systems have big troubles with fast motion
  • The detection of encoded laser shots is a disaster

The “small, but decisive difference”: OIQ’s – IQ-pPLT

the picture shows a shotgroup from a rotating IQ-Container after 1000 shots!

Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, IQ-Allgemein, IQ-Produtcs, IQ-Technology / IQ-System | Leave a comment

World Cup #3, Chengdu, CHN

World Cup #3, Chengdu, CHN (26.05. – 30.05.2011)

Management summary:

  • Shooting device: IQ-Container, UIPM Version 2011
  • Targets: IQ H&M (GER)
  • Lights: NAVISTREET (HUN)
  • Software: CARDSYS (HUN)
  • Power backup: none
  • Work issues / malfunctions:none

Technical matters:

  • The range was prepared for the Asian games, contained 38 targets from IQ and 38 lights with repeaters from NAVISTREET. The result system was provided by CARDSYS. No power back up was provided by LOC as it has to be. No breakdown happened. The data protocol worked faultlessly. The UIPM laser Advisor requested IQ to change the pairing time from 3 minutes to 8 minutes because the experience was that some athletes needed more than 3 minutes. Therefore the power supply needed to be removed from the targets to start the three minutes again of pairing time again. This disturbed the warm up. The experience is, that not every athlete will pair immediately when the start sign is given. IQ should prepare a program which receives signals from paired targets. When all 36 targets are paired it would be possible to close the pairing by a central computer system. This system includes a registration file for each shoot (h&m) from every target. So it will be possible to have a second report (central IQ-system and EASYPENTA or CARDSYS) for a double check of results.

Practical side:

  • During weapon test the checking of the pairing mode was integrated, asking the athletes for a new battery and explaination that they have to pair pistol and target. Translations were given in Chinese and Russian language.
  • 1. Semifinal women
    Range 17 – Gretchichnikowa (RUS) had problems during competition (protest by Russia and jury d’ appelle decision)
    Range 22 – Wojzik (POL) wanted to change the range supposedly malfunction of target.
    At range 30 no problem.
    Following the competition we checked those concerned targets with the athletes weapon. No problems!
  • 2. Semifinal women
    Target 11 breakdown during warm up. It was replaced by a new target, no more problems. IQ checked the radio module and repaired it.
    Target 14 – Döring (GER) breakdown of target during 3rd shooting. 70 seconds at the range.
    Range 22 – Vakalis (CAN) complained in 3rd round three times no blinking of lights. Analysis of shooting result report notice all shots.
    Target 19 – Kolegova (RUS) wanted to change the range supposedly malfunction of target. At range R2 no problem.
  • 1. Semifinal men
    During warm up 2 times breakdown of batteries in pistol.
  • 2. Semifinal men
    Range 2 – Mustafa (EGY) during warm up and 1st round no problem. 2nd shooting no reaction of target. Checking of his pistol resulted in a wrong mode. We change to competition mode and paired pistol and target again so that he could continue competition. But he had to stayed 70 s in second round at the range.
    Range 21 – Kanarya (TUR) battery breakdown during competition. Third shooting 70 s at the range.
  • 3. Semifinal men
    Range 12 – Liu Yang (AUS) changed battery after warm up and didn’t pair it again. First shooting no counting of his shoots because unpaired. Chinese judges didn’t follow the rules they changed to R1 the TEAM paired and he had to shoot, and go on with his competition. The LOC took 4 minutes down from his final result. At the end he wasn’t qualified for final.

Final women

  • No problem no malfunction.

Final men

  • No problem no malfunction.

Mixed relay

  • No problem no malfunction.
  • The weather conditions in all finals – cloudy sky. Athletes and trainer could see every shoot on the black and white part of target. For the future could a small roof above the H&M target solve the visualization problem for athletes and trainer. One of the requirements for laser shooting was about sound when shooting. Every pistol could reduce the power by a screw for air power. If it is reduced, shoot is without any noise and it is possible that power isn’t strong enough to release a shoot.

Weapon test:

  • The attached picture shows you the weight, dimension, trigger and laser mode test and finally the seal and registration of athletes. During laser mode test every athlete was called attention about a new battery.

Conclusion:

  • The system works. Athletes are now able to pair themselves. 95% of athletes understand the new shooting technique. The rest have to analyze their mistakes. It is not fault of the system when some athletes didn’t hit the target and it is also not a question about the visualization of shoots. IQ could prepare a roof for the H&M target which will cover the complete front side, so everybody could see the shoots. The roof would “clip” on the target. No more installation will be necessary. Proposal for World Cup Final: prepare a similar test row and offer for each pistol a new battery.
Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, Facts & Background knowledge, IQ-Technology / IQ-System, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment

World Cup #2, Sassari, ITA

World Cup #2, Sassari, ITA (14.04 – 18.04.2011)

Management summary:

  • Shooting device: IQ-Container, UIPM Version 2011
  • Targets: IQ H&M (GER)
  • Lights: NAVISTREET (HUN)
  • Software: CARDSYS (HUN)
  • Power backup: none
  • Work issues / malfunctions:
  • Update of IQ-Software for targets for the relay match (up to 6 Pistols / range = target)
  • Update of IQ-Software for IQ-Containers
  • data transfer errors detected
  • ocasional non recognition of missed shots

Technical matters:

  • The range contained 38 targets from IQ and 38 lights from NAVISTREET. No repeaters. Result system was provided by CARDSYS. No power back up was provided by the LOC. No power break down. First time of relay matches with the IQ-Laser System. Each team shot on one target with all athletes. The targets were re-programmed so that they could receive the data protocol from the weapon of the according athletes. The first 3 minutes in warm up they have to connect their laser pointer with the target. All IQ-Containers received a update by IQ.

Practical side:

  • The target problem from Palm Springs was solved, no double initiation. But a new problem appeared. Some targets didn’t receive the first shot and didn’t start the 70 seconds. In the six semifinal and during shooting some targets didn’t register shots. The time was running but the athletes didn’t see the blinking of the lights for missed shots when they shoot. If this happened we didn’t register the shots via software. The data protocol is necessary for responses on problems or protests. Before the final again all IQ-Containers were checked for the right setup-mode and the targets to be paired propperly. In the women’s final there was no problem of starting the 70 seconds but again in registration on three targets. Two targets seemed to have a problem of registering shots on the black aim. We changed them. The laser works, the targets register the shots and sent a signal to the lights, the lights are blinking. After evaluation of the data sheets by CARDSYS we realised the registration problems. In the men’s final we notice only the registering problem of non-blinking of missed shots. In the mixed relay we experienced no problems.

Weapon test:

  • IQ and the UIPM Laser advisor checked the Pistols like in the first WC. This time 10 hours were needed. The idea was to handle that part of the competition easier for athletes and LOC. But after weapon test there were some problems with pistols. Some athletes said that some pistols didn’t work like before or were damaged. The other side is that the athletes and trainers complained about transparency of weapon check. At the moment we have only one test system for caliber from Dr. Schneider company and one laser class test. Both are not proved by UIPM. To check the laser and the caliber it is necessary to have a room with a constant light. As long we do not have a proved method of test we should come back to the weapon test of UIPM rules – trigger and measure test at the range before combined by LOC. That makes the test more reliable transparent and trustable.

Rules:

  • The UIPM Laser Advisor stated: The current laser competitions are working with rules for pellet shooting. The laser container is a fragile electronic component. If you touch the table too strong the electronic could damage and stop working. Nobody could see a breakdown from outside. Don’t touch the table any longer, or if it is possible UIPM could work with a shock absorber on the table. If a laser and caliber test is required, we have to revise the rules and amend with the technological components. The laser mode for a competition must also clarified. At the moment nobody knows how to change the mode and which mode is needed for a competition. A seminar for trainer and athlete could be helpful.

Conclusion:

In the finals the system worked. The problems with the data transfer has to be solved by the involved companies. The laser test has to be clarified. Rules has to be adapted to the new system.

Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, Facts & Background knowledge, IQ-Produtcs, IQ-Technology / IQ-System, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment

World Cup #1, Palm Springs, USA

World Cup #1, Palm Springs, USA (24.02. – 27.02.2011)

Management summary:

  • Shooting device: IQ-Container, UIPM Version 2011
  • Targets: IQ H&M (GER)
  • Lights: SIMPOWER (FRA)
  • Software: EASYPENTY (FRA)
  • Power backup: none
  • Work issues / malfunctions:
  • Update of IQ-Software for IQ-Containers
  • wireless address collision detected & solved
  • First UIPM World Cup in Palm Springs. The report includes technical matters, the practical side, weapon test and questions about UIPM rules. It is high time to think about modification due to the laser shooting.

Technical matter:

  • The LOC prepared a shooting range for 38 targets as it is requested in the rules, but not in that way as it has to be build. The firing places of the athletes didn’t correspond to the targets.
  • Targets were presented by Mr. Kremer, the LOC rented them. IQ prepared the Software in a way, that the build in LEDiods didn’t work because it disturb the concentration of the competitors. EASYPENTA was responsible for the result system, and also for the lights. The LOC in Palm Springs was not able to know what is needed for a competition. They ordered only lights for the athletes no repeaters which created new problems for spectators. Spectators were not able to follow the competition because they couldn’t see the lights. SIMPOWER brought 8 new lights and the rest was an older generation of lights. For these 30 lights it was necessary to buy electric power adapters. At the moment there is no financial solution for that case! For the future the LOC has to be informed about these matters. The preparation for the range took all in all 2 days. Not acceptable. These details have to be cleared before the competition.

We had 2 complete electric breakdown during competition. Therefore the rule 5.18.1.vii for a power backup system is not longer a additionally detail it is a must for laser shooting and all LOCs! The backup power system was bought also by Mr. Kremer.

  • Hit & Miss shooting after connecting targets and pistols was no problem. Sometimes in case of a miss shoot we didn’t see the flashing of the lights. Without flash there will be no data registration. This is also one of the important points for the result system to have a certificate for all shoots in cases such as protests. After the Budapest indoor championships and now Palm Springs, IQ knows about that case and they are working on that problem to solve it for all result systems.

Practical side:

  • Some athletes had a very short time to train with the laser because they received the laser container only in Palm Springs. But they accepted the system and shoot very well and very fast (see the headline about the shooting time world record on the UIPM website). They understand how they have to pair and unpair weapon and target. The handling of the Pistols didn’t change. The athletes load, take aim and shoot like always. For them it was not a big change in shooting and it was absolute clear to follow the rules that means during the loading action they have to get in contact with the table.

Weapon test:

  • We tried a new way to check the laser pistol because we now have the chance to simplify that procedure and if we want to check the laser class and the caliber we need more time and a place which is inside. One day before the first semifinal we checked all the weapons for the first competition. The next day we checked the second semifinal. Each test took about 2 hours. Additional to the normal test we had a caliber and a laser class test. If the weapons pass it we changed all batteries, replace a new one and seal the weapon. That makes it easier for the athletes, LOC and judges. When athletes arrived at the range we had only a seal check. The battery is good for the whole competition days. Only the caliber tester is a problem. IQ ordered one tester from Dr. Schneider company. If we want to place this test for all competitions there must be a solution about the financing from UIPM side. The 500 gram trigger weight and size test has to be reconsidered as well.

Rules:

  • During the technical meeting for the finals there was a big and strong discussion with trainers about rules 5.14.1. v. It needs to be thought about the sense with laser shooting to remain on that rule. For everybody it is easier to accept the loading action during the movement to the table. The athletes have to touch the table but that’s it. Maybe a modification of that rule and announcement of our solution in the next news letter before the next big competition would be helpful. This would help the athletes, trainer and of course the shooting judges. If we decided in that way it would reduce the number of shooting judges and range officials. The view to the spectacle at the range would be much better for TV spectators etc. and there is no more disturbance during the competition.

Seal:

  • We have to think about a broken seal. Is the concerned athlete punished by elimination? A new caliber test is to wasteful to organize at the range at the moment.

Conclusion:

  • The laser system works successful! The athletes are satisfied with the new system, they accept it and handle it very fast! The electronic protection has to be explained and recorded to the rules. For weapon test and rules adaption everybody has to think.
Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, Facts & Background knowledge, IQ-Produtcs, IQ-Technology / IQ-System, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment

Youth Olympic Games, Singapore 2010

Youth Olympic Games, Singapore 2010

Management summary:

  • Shooting device: IQ-Container, UIPM Version 1
  • Targets: IQ Dr.Schneider PLT (GER)
  • Lights: SIMPOWER (FRA)
  • Software: EASYPENTA / OMEGA (FRA / SUI)
  • Power backup: none
  • Work issues / malfunctions:
  • direct sunlight affects sensiblity/recognition of targets
  • this report is based on the discussions, exchange of ideas and experiences before and during the YOG with UIPM Laser Advisor, who was responsible to report to the UIPM headquarters directly.The UIPM Laser Advisor was in Singapore in the function of the UIPM shooting director, he was present before and during the YOG with Klaus Kremer, and Mr. Uwe Keller of Dr. Schneider Meßtechnik GmbH, which developed the first precision laser targets (PLT) for Operate IQ GmbH.

Singapore shooting range

  • The shooting range had been built in north/south direction; the recommendation is/was east/west, as direct sunlight is fatal for Laser Shooting in general.

Result: The range did not give shadow to the targets after 4.30 pm. From this time on the sun “blinded” the cameras in the targets, beginning with half shadow; so the equipment couldn´t work 100% correct. A new roof was built to provide shadow over the targets.

Extreme weather conditions limited how, when and where the practise and competition could take place. Heavy rains and thunderstorms stopped the practise competition often.The design of the range didn’t protect competitors or equipment. Every day all electronic equipment had to be re-installed

In future it would be necessary to have a range designed for all weather conditions, regardless of where competitions take place

  • General: The system was successful and worked under extremely difficult weather conditions

Daily intensive Equipment tests of the Laser Units

  • UIPM purchased STEYR LP 10 pistolsand laser containers through Operate IQ GmbH. These were used in the first official competition in Singapore. All pistols were tested in single target shooting with no malfunction.Next, they were tested in multi-target shooting with each pistol. No malfunctions.
  • General: Some athletes had problems with their shooting technique: with laser it is advisable to not “snatch” the shots

Competitions

  • In the womens individual combined event the sky was cloudy. Range No.4 collapsed. Reserve No.1 was then used. During the competition there were no further problems.In the mens individual combined event, weather conditions were ok. During warm up, there were problems with range No.4 -> R1 was used again. After the mens event, the target and computer in range No.4 were changed. There was an additional malfunction on another range so it was changed shooting to R2.In the mixed relay event, the sun was right behind the range and “blinded” the cameras guiding the system. During warm up there were technical problems of registering shots on a number of ranges. During this competition several shots were not registered. This showed that the system was unpredictable in this kind of setup / daylight condition in the direct sun.

Targets, Precision Laser Targets (PLT), Hit & Miss (H&M)

  • The PLT targets record the point of the laser with a camera and show the result on a computer screen via Software. The computer shows the following two modes:
    1. Training mode, which can be compared to shooting on paper targets
    2. Competition mode, showing hits and misses on the screen

    Training mode is necessary for athletes, because it allowes them to set the pistol and train the basic shooting skills. Competition mode allows to see the results on monitors in front of the athletes. A hit is shown with a green light, a missed shot with a red light. In addition, you can see where the hits are on the targets. Klaus Kremer demonstrated the new Hit & Miss (H&M) target. This system provides the “old” targets without computer connection, an new feature are five LEDiodes. The laser unit (IQ Container) can be “connected” (paired) to the target as soon as the first shot is fired & hits the black valid shot zone; from this moment on, only this pistol can fire on this target. This is a new feature according to the UIPM requirements. The problem of crossfire is solved with this function of the new system. Existing lighting systems (SIMPOWER / NAVISTREET) can be connected to the new H&M targets.

    The disadvantage of the Hit & Miss target is that you can not see where the shots hit on the target. This could lead to disputes from athletes about the right registration of the shots.

  • General: The targets need further development work, due to problems of position of the equipment in relation to the sun and shadows, H&M targets offer anti-cross-fire options

Laser Shooting Range

  • Every LOC is required to prepare a shooting range in accordance to the current UIPM rules. Laser guided shooting offers easy design possibilities. For example, a range with scaffolding material like the English range could be built. It is very easy to build, and rebuilt. It is not very expensive, and it is very light. 
  • Future Idea: The UIPM could think about a complete standard shooting range which every LOC could rent.These would be used to stage all world cup, and world championship events, and help to create a new corporate identity. Further there would be a wide range of advertising / sponsoring / Logo placement options, for further marketing.
  • Such a standard laser shooting range should include the following components:
    • Basic structure
    • Electronic devices
    • A team to construct the range and service it during competitions
    • Advertising the UIPM every four years
    • The range should be “tidy & clean” in regards to photography, connections and other equipment cables, behind shooting tables and walls

    The organizers could prepare their own advertising material because the dimensions would be fixed. A further advantage would be that no-one would need to buy new material for a competition because it would be borrowed from, managed by, and cared for by the UIPM. This would offer security of planning, a new “attractive face” for the UIPM, and easier competition planning and organisation for each LOC. The UIPM would only need to invest once, and in one period it would be amortized.

    UIPM should consider adopting a standard range design and construction. This will help competitors, judges and spectators to identify this part of the sport with modern Pentathlon

Microsoft WINDOWS™ computer operating system

  • The Microsoft WINDOWS™ System used for the PLTs is potentially not safe enough for UIPM’s special needs. There are other computer operating systems which may provide better solutions. Dr. Schneider Messtechnik GmbH company could find out which would give the best protection. The solution would be to adopt another operating system such as one based on Linux. The UIPM should consider to include specialist advisers into their decisions. The current operating system is limited and can arise security problems, in Singapore athletes were “playing” with the computers

Electronic Components

  • Due to different devices and different plug systems all over the world, a standardized system has to be created which avoids malfunction. It is important to agree standards for the following:
    • UPS = uninterruptible power supply
    • Automatic brightness control for changing sun conditions
    • A secured computer operating system
    • LCU = laser calibration unit to check laser diameter and its intensity (power).
    • Higher laser power possibly allows higher tolerances, which could influence the shooting results
    • Avoid crossfire
    •   Laser coding
    • Stable computer interfaces
    •   Analysis of unrecorded hits and shooting times

    General: There is a need for standardised components in the whole computer based system, particularly to remove cables in favour of cable-less connections. This also has a safety aspect

UIPM Working group

  • Based on experiences in Singapore, the UIPM should set up a working group composed of companies, computer experts, modern pentathlon rule experts and a financial advisor. The task of such a group would be to take the lessons learnt from Singapore and seek solutions to operative problems.

There is a need for a small compact Working Group to develop and integrate all aspects of the new laser operated system, especially the adoption of the shooting rules!

Posted in - Modern Pentathlon, Facts & Background knowledge, IQ-Produtcs, IQ-Technology / IQ-System, UIPM competitions | Leave a comment